Comments on: Adobe responds to Photoshop gripes

By: Eboda Kcuf

Eboda Kcuf — Tue, 04 May 2010 20:27:07 +0000

fuck adobe

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 22:31:57 +0000

13.) In Photoshop, after using the text tool (and hitting enter) I hit ‘v’ to choose my cursor, but no, instead you change the typeface of the active layer to Verdana. Thanks, that’s exactly what I wanted. #188

Adobe: This should be fixed in CS4.

Lie. This happened to me every day when I used CS2, and now that I’ve upgraded to CS4, it still does.

By: Fallenclient

Fallenclient — Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:56:25 +0000

4). I would like to use my two CS4 suite activations on my Mac and my Windows laptop. I dont care if they are slightly different between the platforms that others are pointing out i just dont want to fork out more money for a windows version of something i already have on the mac. Jesus. I dont buy different cars for different bloody weather every time i want to drive so why should i have to fork out twice because of a limited and pathetic licence system.

By: drm kills performance and sales

drm kills performance and sales — Sat, 02 Jan 2010 09:52:59 +0000

re #8

SLOWED load time is caused by the “licensing service” software that is wholly unessary to operation It probably reduces “casual piracy” but has in no way stopped the piracy that concerns adobe. It merely serves to annoy paying customers… sometimes into finding other software. DRMfascism is ALWAYS counter productive. Hopefully those who believe it to be a good plan despite ever growing evidence to the contrary will soon abandon torturing clients.

A savvy user can prevent the DRM bloatware from being installed.

CS4 applications load MUCH FASTER when installed without DRM bloatware.

I would offer instructions but adobe would change tactics and I am happy being able to improve my own load time.

Sure it violates the license, but I paid for it, and MY time is valuable, I do not have patience to spare, and I am the sole arbiter of what is allowed to run on MY hardware.

By: Adam

Adam — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:17:35 +0000

Thanks Adobe for taking time out of your busy schedule of overcharging starving artists for monopolist garbage to address 21 of the thousands of gripes on this website with some corporate non-answers. We really appreciate it.

Also thanks for going back and fixing all the bugs and non-features in CS3, rather than addressing them in future versions and charging us another $1000 for releases that introduce different bugs and have even more backwards user interfaces like CS4. Oh wait you’re not doing that my mistake.

By: done

done — Sat, 24 Oct 2009 08:47:14 +0000

guys. just done buy adobe products. download some cracks. why giving them for this crap this amount of money. we are getting since cs2 just beta versions from adobe.

this monopoly has to be breaked apart. f.y. adobe.

By: doc

doc — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 05:41:11 +0000

5). Ok. I can group layers into a group and change the opacity like that.. BUT THAT’S STUPID!!! did you think of the layer structure before you answered the question posed??? obviously not.. if you group the layers into a group then the layers become stacked one on top of another, right after another. well NEWSFLASH! usually a lot of layers that i want to change the opacity to are NOT stacked one after another and if i group them together it will mess up the layer order and make the whole project into shit which i don’t need. so please, do something about it. i mean seriously do something about. it can’t be that hard.

By: anonymous coward

anonymous coward — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:40:04 +0000

2) that’s a non-response. f*** you!

By: George

George — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:28:31 +0000

“Adobe: With every release we make huge efforts to streamline our apps and offer consistent UI and workflows.”

The fact that the Navigator was removed from InDesign in CS4 seems to contradict this. And, yes, it’s “easy” to achieve the same kind of navigation that you could with the Navigator, but when you’re working in Illustrator, Photoshop, and InDesign, it’s hard to get used to not having the Navigator in one of the applications when you’re using it in the other two. (This is not a suggestion that you get rid of it in Illustrator and Photoshop, as well.)

By: What Photoshop means to you? - DesignersTalk

What Photoshop means to you? - DesignersTalk — Sun, 31 May 2009 11:11:15 +0000

[...] Adobe responds to Photoshop gripes