Comments on: Adobe responds to After Effects gripes

By: Joe

Joe — Fri, 20 Nov 2009 04:46:34 +0000

Nice post, but I think that if you are looking for quality results, you need experts who know the ins and outs of it all.

By: Trackback - Free Internation Call >> How to make free international call

Trackback - Free Internation Call >> How to make free international call — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:56:19 +0000

,..] blog.dearadobe.com is one another must read source of tips on this issue,..]

By: Brendan Coots

Brendan Coots — Sun, 03 May 2009 19:04:12 +0000

VERY cool of them to respond like this, but he does dodge (or misses the point) here and there:

“Multiprocessing that doesn’t slow down After Effects renders as often as it speeds them up”

Multiprocessing RAM previews take a long time to fire up all those new instances of AE, sometimes longer than the preview itself takes to generate. Michael’s response talks about matching RAM to cores, totally missing the point.

“Layer groups or folders I could collapse or turn off would be more 21st century”

Obviously the user is talking about having folders to group layers, which comes up a lot on message boards everywhere. Thanks Michael, but searching is not the same as (nor a replacement for) logical grouping/foldering of layers.

By: Chris White

Chris White — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:43:44 +0000

Well, I’m extremely impressed that Adobe was willing to answer so many Dear Adobe questions, I think it’s critically important that we have a way to interact with Adobe despite their size and to have a person from a specific product team is superb! Of course, there were plenty of dogged questions and lots of “good request” answers, it would be nice to hear a little more detail on whether this was actually on their list for improvements or just another item on the someday/maybe list.

Either way, I’m very excited that they were willing to talk to Dear Adobe and it sounds like there’s some cool stuff coming. I’m particularly excited with the new preferences for matching RAM with CPU, I can’t wait to see more pro-apps give us options oh how things can run in our x64 multi-CPU with lots of RAM onboard world that we find ourselves in.

When do we hear back from the Photoshop team?

By: BigRussia

BigRussia — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:11:46 +0000

Читаю твой блог и решил завести свой.

By: Radley Marx » Blog Archive » Adobe’s “Giant” Quality Problem

Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:57:01 +0000

[...] Over the weekend, Lee Brimelow created a brave post hoping to address some common critical questions he’s asked concerning some of Adobe’s inconsistencies. From this post I wandered over to Dear Adobe to catch up on user criticisms and was happy to see Adobe respond to two of the (twenty-five listed) applications: InDesign and After Effects. [...]

By: Devin

Devin — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:12:29 +0000

ya man I totally agree with being able to vary mask feathering. Nuke has it. Smoke has it. Why doesn’t adobe have it? Also you guys should combine premiere pro and adobe after effects and make an Adobe version of Autodesk Smoke. I just want NLE editing in After Effects. Adobe dynamic link is in no way solution to this.

By: הבלוג של ערן שטרן » תמיכה טכנית

הבלוג של ערן שטרן » תמיכה טכנית — Thu, 02 Oct 2008 06:48:42 +0000

[...] כאן. תגובות ובקשות לגבי הגרסה החדשה CS4 אפשר לקרוא בבלוג של אדובי. רוצים להציע הצעה או לדווח על באג בתוכנה, אפשר להעזר [...]

By: Bluebeck blog - links for 2008-09-30

Bluebeck blog - links for 2008-09-30 — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:02:01 +0000

[...] Dear Adobe // Blog » Blog Archive » Adobe responds to After Effects gripes (tags: adobe) [...]

By: aefreemart : Dear Adobe

aefreemart : Dear Adobe — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 04:37:38 +0000

[...] has been very positive about their site and has gone so far as to respond directly to the After Effects Top 25 gripes. It’s a VERY entertaining read. Enjoy! Posted by Michele Yamazaki on Tuesday, September 30, [...]